Design / UX / Leadership
User-Journey.png

UX Research / Strategy

Robert Hendry Research & Strategy

 

Research and Strategy

During my time at Salesforce, my position included deep research and strategy helping to drive the way that users find information about Salesforce products and services and ultimately decide to purchase and adopt them for their businesses across AMER, EMEA and APAC regions. This work included how to create interactive experiences that translated to the different regions, with localized messaging and creative on all web properties.

I led a team of cross functional researchers and designers domestically and internationally in usability testing, ethnographic studies and competitive and market research over a period of more than two years.

 

Research

Research was at the heart of all of our designs regardless of size or complexity. In my time at Salesforce I was given the opportunity to drive the conversation with research, users insight and validation. We acted as an internal agency and funded many of our R&D efforts by performing daily research for all of the product groups in Salesforce.

Our department straddled Product Marketing and the Digital Strategy Group, performing hundreds of usability studies all over the world as we developed out the Salesforce design system.  We also had a full suite of other research services providing full studies, ranging from everything around tree testing, eye tracking, competitive analysis, brand sentiment studies and focus groups to multiyear studies, identifying personas about not only the users of the product but into the users of the website.

We approached the Salesforce properties themselves as extensions of the product and product in and of themselves. We had the support of our fellow researchers and the full resources of Salesforce to do research in house, or work with research partners across the globe depending on urgency, scope and priority of the research questions we were being asked.

Our primary lab was centrally located in San Francisco which allowed us to easily recruit participants from nearby offices/companies. We typically only used this lab for quick usability or mobile studies to prevent what we found to be the “Bay Area bubble” where most users were technically advanced and usually familiar with technical terms and concepts that were not reflective of other areas of the country.

While much of our research focused on the website and marketing and advertisement initiatives, we also explored questions around the complete journey including help and training, up-sale and cross-sale of new features within the product, and installation and activation of 3rd party plugins within Salescloud and beyond.

 

We had a tremendous opportunity each year to partner with larger Salesforce research teams at Dreamforce, which put us in contact with users, customers and prospects. This opportunity allowed us to perform guerilla recruitment and testing among the roughly 170,000 attendees every year.

Having such a large and eager recruitment pool was exciting as a research team, and we had the opportunity to shape the websites and Salesforce products in many ways with a degree of ease not typical of most research teams. 

Each year at Dreamforce we would mobilize the entire UX team to answer questions, perform surveys and conduct tests to not only conduct the primary research but also mentor and teach the entire team outside of research. This provided excellent teachable moments for designers and junior staff on how to recruit users, perform tests and practice the art of low price ad-hoc usability testing methods in an environment that was friendly and low-risk.

 

One of the most critical and long-running projects that the team completed was the definition of the buyer personas for three of our market segments: (very) Small business, Mid-size and Enterprise. Each of these segments had vastly different motivations, processes, timelines and actors that we needed to understand.

The process included in depth interviews, surveys and focus groups in key locations like Chicago, New York and San Francisco, but also included places like Indianapolis Indiana, and Cedar Falls Iowa to ensure that there was no bias or data that told an incomplete picture about our prospects outside of major metropolitan areas.

My role was to define the elements that would make up the persona, moderate in the collection of data, manage the team of researchers and work with stakeholders on delivery expectations and define new reachers goals and metrics around the delivery as whole.

Click here to view the entire ESMB persona

 

Prototyping and R and D was critical to our UX department and we typically had 1-2 concepts per quarter that would be first pitched to executive leadership, prototyped, and tested. If/when it was proven to be successful, a given concept would be developed for a small live test on the site.

We had a top-notch creative tech department that worked tirelessly to implement the design into an engaging and interactive component and experience that would drive our testing cues and ultimately our A/B multivalent testing schedule on the live site.

One of the best deliverables of this process was out interactive demo located here: 
https://www.salesforce.com/campaign/interactive-video-tour/

 

One of my primary focuses as an individual contributor and later the head of research was our global navigation. A lot of time and effort was spent across the company to redesign and refine the global navigation across all the sites, to take what was once 20 different navigation paradigms and first standardize it but then create a seamless nav that went into the product or logged in experience.

The eternal battle against stakeholders to “shove” things into the global nav was constant, but the introduction of new acquisitions of whole product lines and features was also a fulltime thankless job.

Despite the difficulty, I enjoyed the deep involvement of such a high priority and high visibility project that took me all over the world testing the localization of the information architecture and new interaction concepts that were developed to support the immense amount of content that had to live in it.

 
Screen Shot 2020-05-13 at 11.25.10 AM.png

Another major focus of mine was to improve the way that users could leave feedback about the Salesforce experience. I owned the passive feedback mechanism across all of the sites and worked to bring the feature away from an expensive external vendor (Opinion Lab) with a terrible user experience to a streamlined Salesforce on Salesforce stack that we could customize.

The goal was not only to improve the UX but to reduce costs for the business and standardize the data collection and results into a usable metric that we could rely on and use to measure our progress of the redesign. This process took three years to prioritize and create, involving many in strategy, engineering, product management and beyond, as the task of customizing the Salesforce product to our specifications was not as easy as I had hoped.

The result was an uptick in the quality and quantity of users’ feedback as well as establishing reliability on the exact metric we wanted to use to measure—the voice of the customer feedback we received.

 

Strategy

In my time at Salesforce, I participated and helped drive the strategy of the large content and routing ecosystem that exists now across Salesforce properties worldwide. We developed everything from the ground up with no shortcuts around the experiences of initial product discovery, product demonstration and adopting through support. We leveraged the AEM platform as it promised to provide the capabilities of deep personalization of the journey across all of the channels.

The role helped me and my team define, analyze and build things like the Chat bots, interactive multimedia libraries, Help & training portals and large event registration ecosystems that were using the latest in cutting edge technology that are global, scalable and and based on UX best practices to elevate our public facing properties to be award winning and best in class.

 

Design thinking sessions helped us to understand and optimize the journey that our user took in the discovery of Salesforce products services and support. We worked across silos and departments to ensure that all stakeholders had a voice and were able to provide input on the creative process.

We spent considerable time thinking about the various stages in which someone makes a decision, and mapping each touch point to create interactions with content or the brand via multi-channel journeys that created moments of delight and kept the user engaged. My work was focused on how a user’s behavior differs in the various stages, starting from before the marketing funnel and continuing on after for support, training and customization.

I drove the strategy and design of the content marketing ecosystem, and how first-time new users arrived on the site that was not specifically or directly related to Salesforce products or services. Working with SMEs, writers and stakeholders, we created a complex section that contained rich top-of-funnel content as well as in depth content about related topics eventually leading to product information, all within a centrally located location in the primary nav.

 

Personalization

We aimed to prove that we could in fact improve our metrics—like increasing conversions, user satisfaction, and event registration—when we addressed what we thought the users were looking for, and reduced friction associated with navigating a large enterprise site.

Personalization was a promise of AEM, and ensuring that we delivered the right message at the right time to the right person was central in our personalization strategy. We identified the simple opportunities that we could leverage to personalize things like the home page and menus and journeys, and started by running small pilots across small subsets of users.

The devil is always in the details. It turned out that ensuring we were collecting all of the correct analytics and tracking data that were granular enough from the users’ behavior, while tying it into demographic information, product information from a logged in state, and stitching all that together to form a coherent picture and plan was more difficult than we thought.

 

Optimization

Of course, a major focus throughout my time in strategy was optimization.  The forms were a particularly sensitive area that required a lot of politics and care. There was much uncertainty and fear when it came time to redesign the forms, so when we redesigned the entire system we did the forms last to prevent disruption to the lead flow.

We applied UX principals and methodologies. Introducing simple things like labeling, descriptions, accurate photos and clear error states increased site wide global conversion 18% when we did A/B multivalent testing. With guidance, we eventually changed all 10,000 forms on the site and finished the design system, which actually made a significant difference to the bottom line.

 

Chat Bots

The problem we were trying to solve for with this feature was to reduce the amount of misrouted and junk phone calls that were not sales related to live agents. A tremendous amount of time was wasted on customer calls regarding things that needed tech support for existing products, help with trials and many other things that were readily available on the site but not obvious and sometimes hidden deep inside the product.

We designed a chat bot that would attempt to answer simple questions or simply route the user to the correct section or starting point for their issue. We worked with tech support, sales and product management to create a chat bot that would be able to affect this efficiently.